
nanog mailing list archives
Re: layer 3 switch debate
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:59:52 -0400
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Core routers typically don't do any filtering and the BGP setup (if any) is straightforward, so switch-like routers are good here.
May god have mercy on your core. Or, to paraphrase Randy Bush, "I fully encourage my competitors to design their network this way." -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- layer 3 switch debate ip dude (Sep 26)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 26)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: layer 3 switch debate ip dude (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Charles Sprickman (Sep 27)
- JUNO.COM Richard Irving (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)