nanog mailing list archives

Re: Have worm? University upgrades network


From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 03:11:00 -0500 (EST)


On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 warner () cats ucsc edu wrote:
What we (UC Santa Cruz) share with LB is the vendor that will be
adding scanning to their net-auth box: Perfigo.  We have heard of
the LB plans indirectly through the vendor, but in the context of
the article, it all fits.

Do people find "self-certification" by end-users actually fixes anything?

Or do users keep on clicking on the "Yes, I'm Clean" button?

In the meantime, you still have to carry the traffic from the infected
computer if only on your quarantine "network." Usually the quarantine LAN
is some type of virtual network, so the underlying bandwidth is still
consumed by the traffic. Its amazing what happens to a registration
server when an infected computer tries to register tens of thousands of
times a minute.  Redirecting the user traffic to a quarantine server,
results in that server getting whalloped.



Current thread: