nanog mailing list archives
Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 10:24:03 -0500
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 10:16:49 GMT, Michael.Dillon () radianz com said:
Email peering *IS* a smarter hammer. If all the cluefull email administrators would set up peering agreements with each other and exchange contact information, there would be fewer of these situations.
There's a lot more people doing SMTP than doing BGP. Also, AS1312 (us) and our related routing swamp does BGP peering with less than a dozen peers, but we end up talking SMTP to a good chunk of the world. I've got one machine that all by itself talked to 2,615 hosts in 1,612 second-level domains yesterday. Unless you're advocating a return to the X.400-style ADMD/PRMD stuff, this really is a non-starter. I don't have time to set up 1,600+ peering agreements, and possibly have to set up more just because somebody subscribes to a mailing list (either somebody elsewhere subscribes to ours, or one of my users subscribes elsewhere). And history has passed its own verdict on ADMD/PRMD.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner, (continued)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner james (Dec 05)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner just me (Dec 05)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner james (Dec 05)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Dec 05)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 06)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner william (Dec 05)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 05)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner Tom (UnitedLayer) (Dec 05)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 08)
- email peering and abuse reporting, was Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner John R. Levine (Dec 08)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 08)
- Re: Need Contact at RoadRunner Tom (UnitedLayer) (Dec 08)
