nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS Path Loops in practice ?
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:36:22 -0800 (PST)
--- "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk> wrote:
3) One advantage of using a public, albeit common,customer ASN is that if acustomer has RIR-allocated space, those IPs willmake it onto the globaltable, and will not suffer the filtering which maybe present for theprovider's own routes.Ok this seems to be a difference, altho not sure why the custs IPs should need to do anything different from the providers IPs as presumably both need to be reachable from everywhere?
There are providers out there who treat $PEER differently from $CUSTOMER_OF_PEER, with regard to aggregation etc. Also, I believe that there used to be providers who would dampen routes on a per-AS basis, rather than on a per-route basis. I am not sure whether anyone still does this. ===== David Barak -fully RFC 1925 compliant- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
Current thread:
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ?, (continued)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 08)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Ben Crocker (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Niels Bakker (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Leo Bicknell (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Niels Bakker (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Leo Bicknell (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Jeff Aitken (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? David Barak (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 12)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? David Barak (Dec 12)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Niels Bakker (Dec 09)
