nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS Path Loops in practice ?


From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:36:22 -0800 (PST)



--- "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
wrote:
3) One advantage of using a public, albeit common,
customer ASN is that if a
customer has RIR-allocated space, those IPs will
make it onto the global
table, and will not suffer the filtering which may
be present for the
provider's own routes.

Ok this seems to be a difference, altho not sure why
the custs IPs should need 
to do anything different from the providers IPs as
presumably both need to be 
reachable from everywhere?


There are providers out there who treat $PEER
differently from $CUSTOMER_OF_PEER, with regard to
aggregation etc.

Also, I believe that there used to be providers who
would dampen routes on a per-AS basis, rather than on
a per-route basis.  I am not sure whether anyone still
does this.




=====
David Barak
-fully RFC 1925 compliant-

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/


Current thread: