nanog mailing list archives
Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement
From: "Joseph T. Klein" <jtk () titania net>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 15:02:26 -0500
Another example of how lack of splay allows DDOS to devastate a network. Paul Vixie's presentation on anycast F root server provided good points about splay. They need more peer points and sites, not a move from point A to point B. On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 01:58 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:I suppose contacting upstreams for traceback and filtration isn't something they want to do??I may not be on the correct lists to hear about the local Pakistan ISP scene, but I didn't find much technical information about what was happening. The attacks APPEAR to be originating from India and a virus called YAHAwhich targets certain Pakistan government web sites, .PK top-level domain name servers and the primary Internet exchange in Pakistan. Most of the Pakistan Internet traffic is funneled through a single exchange point andofficial provider PTCL. Good for intelligence agencies, bad for reliability and DDOS survivability. YAHA variants have been circulating since last June. The infectedcomputers are inside and outside of Pakistan, and continuing to increaseSo you need to solve 1. Viruses 2. Spam 3. DDOS I suppose you could renumber/rename Pakaistan. But when the next variant of Yaha was released, it would probably just include the updated information. One of the government ministers suggested moving some of the officialsites to the colocation in the US. It might help in the short term, sincethe US has excess bandwidth and can absorb the attacks longer.
-- Joseph T. Klein VP/CTO and bottle washer Titania Corporation, Inc. PSTN: +1 415 462 1534 Mobile: +1 414 628 3380
Current thread:
- Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Sean Donelan (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Christopher L. Morrow (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Eric Gauthier (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Sean Donelan (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Joe Abley (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Joseph T. Klein (May 05)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Vijay Gill (May 05)
- We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Sean Donelan (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Christopher L. Morrow (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) E.B. Dreger (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Rob Thomas (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement) Phil Rosenthal (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Scott Granados (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) John Payne (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Rob Thomas (May 06)
- Re: We have a firewall (was Re: Pakistan government orders ISPservice level agreement) Scott Granados (May 06)
- Re: Pakistan government orders ISP service level agreement Christopher L. Morrow (May 05)
