nanog mailing list archives
Moving G and H off .MIL hosts (was Re: .mil domain)
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:23:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
In recent times, a lot of .mil have thrown up a whole bunch of null routes to large sections of international address space. Good luck getting them removedas this means they have a different definition of the internet than the one to which i, and i suspect others, are used, why should i and others accept their routes?
If the .MIL network can't provide International Internet service, is it time to move the g.root-servers.net and h.root-servers.net off their current .MIL hosts to better locations to serve the entire Internet. Otherwise .MIL policies reduce the robustness of the overall Internet. Heck, even when Paul Vixie did his original black-hole lists, he made certain that even the worst spammers could still use f.root-servers.net.
Current thread:
- .mil domain Steve Waddington (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Christopher L. Morrow (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Stephen Sprunk (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain John Payne (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain John Payne (May 30)
- Moving G and H off .MIL hosts (was Re: .mil domain) Sean Donelan (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Stephen Sprunk (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Mike Tancsa (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain listuser (May 30)
- RE: .mil domain Mark Borchers (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Mark T. Ganzer (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Ryan Mooney (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: .mil domain Richard Irving (May 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Moving G and H off .MIL hosts (was Re: .mil domain) Kevin Day (May 30)
