nanog mailing list archives
data request on Sitefinder
From: Steve Bellovin <smb () research att com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:59:43 -0400
The session this morning ran out of time, so I didn't get to ask my
question.
Verisign's review panel has identified a number of problems -- I won't
argue if they're minor or not -- that are addressable with software
changes. We heard this morning that Postfix is an application that
will need to be changed to handle the proposed new version of
Sitefinder's MX record. Of course, it's generally considered a good
idea to test sofware before deploying it.
So -- how much notice would the operator community want before
deploying new software? What about for enterprises? (We all know that
stuff *can* be deployed more quickly in emergency circumstances. We
also know the problems that that can lead to, which is why we generally
want testing and controlled deployment.)
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- data request on Sitefinder Steve Bellovin (Oct 20)
- RE: data request on Sitefinder Jeroen Massar (Oct 20)
- RE: data request on Sitefinder Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder todd glassey (Oct 20)
- RE: data request on Sitefinder Jeroen Massar (Oct 20)
- sclavos interview (Re: data request on Sitefinder) Paul Vixie (Oct 20)
- RE: data request on Sitefinder Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 20)
- RE: data request on Sitefinder Jeroen Massar (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Kee Hinckley (Oct 20)
- Re[2]: data request on Sitefinder Richard Welty (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder Owen DeLong (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder todd glassey (Oct 20)
- Re: data request on Sitefinder William Allen Simpson (Oct 20)
