nanog mailing list archives
Re: New attack against port 135?
From: Mike Tancsa <mike () sentex net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:48:26 -0400
Yes, we saw this yesterday and posted to full-disclosure. Here is a sample packet.
13:43:38.511675 xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx 0800 62: 64.7.nn.yy.3512 > 16.181.zz.aa.135: S [tcp sum ok] 3772716186:3772716186(0) win 65340 <mss 1452,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF) (ttl 127, id 63248, len 48)
0x0000 4500 0030 f710 4000 7f06 e5d6 4007 975b E..0..@.....@..[
0x0010 10b5 36c9 0db8 0087 e0df 149a 0000 0000 ..6.............
0x0020 7002 ff3c 6151 0000 0204 05ac 0101 0402 p..<aQ..........
---Mike
At 01:26 PM 10/10/2003, Peter John Hill wrote:
I am seeing lots of scanning of port 135 on my network. 66 byte long packets. Anyone have a name for this? It is less aggressive than the welchia scans I have seen. Seems to scan at about 3000 or so flows per 5 minutes.Thanks Peter Hill Network Engineer Carnegie Mellon
Current thread:
- New attack against port 135? Peter John Hill (Oct 10)
- Re: New attack against port 135? Andrew D Kirch (Oct 10)
- Re: New attack against port 135? Mike Tancsa (Oct 10)
