nanog mailing list archives
Re: the gauntlet is thrown
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Scott Bradner writes:http://www.icann.org/correspondence/twomey-to-lewis-03oct03.htm* bmanning () karoshi com (bmanning () karoshi com) [Fri 03 Oct 2003, 16:47 CEST]:This is a return volly. The service in this match was three weeks ago.So the question is now, who has who by the jugulars in this threesome between ICANN, VeriSign and the Internet technical community? Or worded even more clearly, who controls/owns who - VeriSign ICANN and the Internet, or we ICANN and therefore VeriSign enough to not matter? -- Niels.
as I understand it:
the "internet technical community" has no part in this matter. (*)
there are a series of interlocking MOUs/CRADAs/Contracts between
ICANN/USDOC/Verisign that cover a range of topics, some of which
include the on-going care/feeding of .com and .net. (*) we get
to watch this match from the sidelines.
(*) as a community (technical and otherwise) we do get to "vote" with our
editors or in conjuntion w/ our vendors. with enough disgust/distaste
it is possible either lie to ones self and ones customers/clients about
what has been done (aka the BIND patch), to abandon .com/.net (easier
said than done), let mob-rule anoint others to be the authoritative
source for .com/.net. -or- accept the changes and get on w/ life.
pick one of the four.
--bill
Current thread:
- the gauntlet is thrown Scott Bradner (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown bmanning (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown Niels Bakker (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown bmanning (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown Sean Donelan (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown wayne (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown David Lesher (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown Ido Dubrawsky (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown Niels Bakker (Oct 03)
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown bmanning (Oct 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: the gauntlet is thrown Peter H Salus (Oct 03)
