nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mail with no purpose?
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:15:10 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Richard Cox wrote:
Some times the request goes to the website, sometimes a DNS request to nameservers is sufficient to cause the account to be tagged as active.
I don't quite understand how that would work. DNS Request does not contain name of who the email is addressed to unless instead of using something like "http://spammersserver.com/confirmemail.cgi?yourname () yourdomain com" they rewrite it into "http://emailidstring.spammerserver.com" and use some custom dns server that can log all such requests. But I really dont see how this would be any different then just logging with cgi, it'll result in positive logging for exactly same set of people. For example as I'm using PINE from unix shell, all those html images are not referenced in any way, nor are there requests set for them in dns. Where as WYSIWYG html email client (no matter if its web-based or outlook or mozilla) will reference and display all images contained in email -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william () elan net
Current thread:
- Spam with no purpose? Deepak Jain (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Richard Welty (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Adrian Chadd (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 31)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Jerry Eyers (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Randy Bush (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? bmanning (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Randy Bush (Apr 01)
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Richard Cox (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Eric A. Hall (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 01)
- Re: Mail with no purpose? Richard Cox (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spam with no purpose? Gregory Hicks (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? william(at)elan.net (Mar 31)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Paul Jakma (Apr 02)
- RE: Spam with no purpose? Michel Py (Mar 31)
