nanog mailing list archives
RE: Lazy network operators
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:40:19 -0700
David Cantrell wrote: Sounds to me like you need a new ISP.
Stephen J. Wilcox: Not being happy with the ISP's smarthost is not justification to run your own; you should change ISPs..
Always like when people have miracle solutions. Care to suggest just _one_ that does it for $36 a month? That includes: - Static IP - 384k up - 1.5m down - historically very high reliability - national dial-up account included - 50 meg attachements authorized - mailing list traffic (large number of recipients) I'm all ears?
Daryl G. Jurbala wrote: Reverting to 56k dialup to solve a mail relay problem on your only choice for 3MB/512k service doesn't exactly sound reasonable.
Thank you.
Petri Helenius wrote: Changing providers when problems arise is a viable option when; - Available services are more uniform - Email addresses are generally portable - Switching your local access provider happens in less than a business day or two And as has been previously stated, most people don“t have multiple options for local provider unless they want to dial up.
Thank you. Michel.
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Miquel van Smoorenburg (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators daryl (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Vivien M. (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators daryl (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Dr. Jeffrey Race (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Daniel Senie (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 14)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Payne (Apr 15)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 16)
- RE: Lazy network operators Michel Py (Apr 17)
- RE: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 17)
- Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 18)
- RE: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 17)
