nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:18:58 +0300
Paul Vixie wrote:
Maybe it would go the way of the POTS, ask the regulator to help and something will happen in a decade after the marketshares have been divided?it's important to remember that large network owners don't care about this, and they are the ones who tell the vendors what to build. someone who wants to build a 3G network doesn't want A6/DNAME or any other added complexity adding logic and bugs to their handhelds or their cell towers. someone who wants to sell a lot of business-DSL is happier if their customers are locked in. so exactly where the multi6 group is planning to sell their results, i can't imagine.
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joel Jaeggli (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators Pekka Savola (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Niels Bakker (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 16)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Apr 20)
- RE: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
