nanog mailing list archives
Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:18:02 +0000 (GMT)
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Daniel Senie wrote:
At 05:56 PM 4/22/2004, Dan Hollis wrote:Is there any way to move BGP completely out-of-band? I know multihop may be out of the question but maybe someone should write up a proposal for PTP links. :-)BGP over PPP? Could be specified, but that'd require replacing the use of TCP. Might be a bit ugly to implement, especially on larger routers with separate control planes.
wasn't there a PPP over SMTP spec? that sounds like a plan for this!
Current thread:
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability, (continued)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Kevin Oberman (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rodney Joffe (Apr 28)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability James (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Deepak Jain (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability James (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Dan Hollis (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Daniel Senie (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Rob Thomas (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability E.B. Dreger (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Alexei Roudnev (Apr 22)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 21)
