nanog mailing list archives
Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation?
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:13:37 +0300 (IDT)
Hi Rick
You seem slightly confused:
All the URLs you sent are for 10/100 ethernet switches/hubs
(I inserted the relevant title below each url )
--
Rafi
## On 2004-08-11 10:39 -0400 Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez typed:
R"G>
R"G> Wayne,
R"G>
R"G> My organization has recently switched from a similar infrastructure to
R"G> the following:
R"G>
R"G> Core: http://www.svec.com/PRODUCTS/fd800ds/FD800DS2.htm
FD800DS 8-port Dual Speed Hub
R"G> Distribution layer: http://www.svec.com/Products/FD521EDS.HTM
FD521 5-port Fast Ethernet Switch
R"G> Wire closet: http://www.svec.com/Products/fd510eds.htm
FD510 5-Port Fast Ethernet Hub
R"G>
R"G> We have seen a noticeable increase in performance, ROI, and
R"G> manageability following the migration away from the prior 3Com
R"G> solution. If you have any implementation-specific questions, please
R"G> mail me off list and I'll do my best to answer them.
R"G>
R"G> With regards,
R"G> ---Rico
R"G>
Current thread:
- Testing procedures for new network implementation? Wayne Chow (Aug 11)
- Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation? Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Aug 11)
- Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation? Rafi Sadowsky (Aug 11)
- Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation? Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Aug 11)
- Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation? Rafi Sadowsky (Aug 11)
- Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation? Will Hargrave (Aug 11)
- Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation? Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Aug 11)
