nanog mailing list archives
Re: Specialty Technical Publishers
From: Mark Barker <barkerm () cox net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:38:54 -0400
Invoicing for unsolicited materials is commonly referred to as "mail fraud" hereabouts. The courts have consistently upheld the notion that such materials can be considered gifts. IANAL but I would advise /dev/nulling all further correspondence from these losers.
-- MAB On Aug 18, 2004, at 18:36, Mike Lewinski wrote:
Has anyone else has run into these scumbags? Sometime last winter I received a call along the lines of "We'd like to send you some materials to review". Well, they sent some "Internet Law encyclopedia" along with an invoice for ~$700. Of course, there was no cost mentioned in the sales call- for all I knew they were going to send me a brochure about their product. I can say with 100% certainty that I would never have authorized them to send me something like this had they mentioned the cost without much further discussion as to what I was receiving.This is just a general heads-up to a sleazy business practice for a sleazy company that is now attempting to extort money.
Current thread:
- Specialty Technical Publishers Mike Lewinski (Aug 18)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Mark Barker (Aug 18)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Owen DeLong (Aug 18)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Mike Lewinski (Aug 18)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Matt Ghali (Aug 19)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Aug 19)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Owen DeLong (Aug 19)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Matt Ghali (Aug 20)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Joshua Brady (Aug 20)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Owen DeLong (Aug 18)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Mark Barker (Aug 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Specialty Technical Publishers Michel Py (Aug 18)
- Re: Specialty Technical Publishers Mike Lewinski (Aug 18)
- RE: Specialty Technical Publishers Michel Py (Aug 18)
