nanog mailing list archives
RE: Best Practices for Enterprise networks
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:50:39 GMT
Of course it can work. My point is that it is a fact of life, nothing more. Pointing out the obvious: Dependent upon who is/are your upstream provider(s), and how specific the prefix announcements are made to their peers (re: your reachability) determines just how symmetric your traffic patterns will be. - ferg -- "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us> wrote:
Asymmetric paths are a fact of life in the Internet.
Not for enterprise operators except the largest ones. Asymmetric traffic does happen in the core, where there are no firewalls or NATs; as far as the edge is concerned though I know several companies that multihome to two or more ISPs but only in one location, largely because they don't want to deal with NAT/firewall issues. Although it can work, it requires extra engineering and most of the time a fat pipe to replicate state information between the sites. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
Current thread:
- Best Practices for Enterprise networks Tracy Smith (Aug 29)
- Re: Best Practices for Enterprise networks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Best Practices for Enterprise networks Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Aug 29)
- Re: Best Practices for Enterprise networks Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 29)
- RE: Best Practices for Enterprise networks Michel Py (Aug 29)
- RE: Best Practices for Enterprise networks Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Aug 29)
