nanog mailing list archives
Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question)
From: John Kristoff <jtk () northwestern edu>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:45:08 -0600
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:56:23 -0800 Greg Albrecht <gba () undef net> wrote:
are we obligated, as a user of ARIN ip space, or per some BCP, to provide ad-hoc reverse dns to our customers with-out cost, or without financial obligation.
I thought I saw some 'MUST' statements in an RFC about this in the past, but I can't find anything at the moment. My guess is that you are not obligated to really do anything for free. Market pressure may be the deterrent in charging for each basic service request. You might argue to provide the option of delegating the reverse zones for your customers to self-manage without incurring any additional cost. This may not work well in your specific environment however. John
Current thread:
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question), (continued)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Andre Oppermann (Dec 02)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Mark Andrews (Dec 02)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Douglas Otis (Dec 02)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Andre Oppermann (Dec 03)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Henning Brauer (Dec 04)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) william(at)elan.net (Dec 04)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Henning Brauer (Dec 04)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) william(at)elan.net (Dec 04)
- Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question) Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Dec 01)
