nanog mailing list archives

Re: New Computer? Six Steps to Safer Surfing


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:09:35 +0000 (GMT)



On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:22:17 +0000 (GMT), Christopher L. Morrow
<christopher.morrow () mci com> wrote:
there are others of course... it's not the OS that matters in the long
run, it's the administration of that OS (or so it seems to me, admittedly
not a sysadmin though, anymore). Sure, initial/default installs might be
problematic in one/all OS's, but by and large extended lifetimes on a
live/hostile network means patches must be applied. Seems like that
doesn't happen by and large.

[waiting for an OpenVMS user to speak up]

Frankly, from an operational perspective, I guess the only way to go
is to trust the inside of your network even less than you trust the
outside ... and have processes that quickly isolate and block access

This is quite correct... The blocking/isolation is helped if the network
is segmented early on, permit that traffic which is 'normal' place some
ids-like devices around and correlate logs/reports/incidents to properly
react when something goes awry.

from / to compromised hosts till they are fixed.

Modulo various "100% efficient" solutions that I see advertised, we do
need a reliable, and quick reacting, way to do this.


I'm not such a fan of the auto-acting devices, I'd rather have a person
review the action prior to taking it.... Each security/network person
should determine how best to handle that themselves though.


Current thread: