nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation?
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:45:17 +0200 (EET)
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Mark Andrews wrote:
RFC 3363 does NOT say that DNAME is deprecated. All it says
is that since A6 was moving the exprimental using DNAME to
support renumbering is deprecated.
Which part of:
Therefore, in moving RFC 2874 to experimental,
the intent of this document is that use of DNAME RRs in the reverse
tree be deprecated.
do you difficulties in parsing?
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation?, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Feb 10)
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Feb 10)
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Feb 10)
- Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? leo vegoda (Feb 11)
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Feb 10)
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Randy Bush (Feb 10)
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Feb 10)
- Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Feb 10)
- Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Ronald van der Pol (Feb 11)
- Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Pekka Savola (Feb 11)
- Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Edward Lewis (Feb 11)
- Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Paul Vixie (Feb 11)
- RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Feb 11)
