nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unbelievable Spam.
From: vijay gill <vgill () vijaygill com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:56:55 +0000
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:31:00AM +0000, Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote:
inject large volumes of email into the system? The existing non-hierarchical email exchange network is not scalable. I hope that everyone on this list can understand what the email exchange overlay network is and recognize that it is subject to similar scaling rules as the underlying IP network.
So you are saying that the existing email exchange network is not scalable because it is non-hierarchical? It looks like its scaled pretty well so far. Maybe I'm not understanding something. The entire paragraph quoted appears to be entirely content free except for some various assertions. Could you elaborate further on 1) how the existing non-hierarchical email exchange network is not scalable. What are your definitions of "scale" and what are the current choking points that you see? 2) the email exchange overlay network and the similarities to the underlying ip network with elaborations on how the hierarchy of IP maps to the hierarchy in email overlays. thanks /vijay
Current thread:
- Re: Unbelievable Spam., (continued)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Jeff Shultz (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Richard Welty (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Roland Perry (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Paul Vixie (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Vadim Antonov (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Brian Bruns (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Vadim Antonov (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Bill Thompson (Feb 02)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Michael . Dillon (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Alexei Roudnev (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. vijay gill (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Alexander Bochmann (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Tom (UnitedLayer) (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: Unbelievable Spam. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
