nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath
From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rubens () email com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:50:48 -0200
T(> > Flow-based: Foundry with IronCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500 with
Sup1(A)
T(> > Prefix-based: Foundry with JetCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500/7600
with
T(> > Sup2(A), Sup3(A/BXL) T(> T(> The 2948G-L3 and the 4908G-L3 I believe are Prefix/ASIC based. T(> I believe the 3550-EMI is as well, but I'm not familiar with that T(> equipment. T(> T(> Anyone know about the: Cisco Catalyst 3750 ? Nortel Passport 8600/1600 ?
Nortel Passport 8600 is flow-based according to a description I saw once; it might have changed.
As for the 3550-EMI "real life" experience as a 10/100 BT aggregation
switch
wasn't affected(CPU <5%) at all by rather aggressive scanning but did generate around 11 Mb/sec of ARP requests on all the 100Mb/sec ports in
the same
VLAN and totally killed connectivity to legacy equipment connected at 10
Mb/s ... Cisco Cat6k/Sup2+ has some throttling mechanisms that are worth testing to see if it also happens on that architeture. Rubens
Current thread:
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath, (continued)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Donovan Hill (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath John Lyons (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rafi Sadowsky (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath sthaug (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
