nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?
From: Brett Watson <brett () the-watsons org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:19:01 -0700
Wasn't it established that they did infact not leak it but just routed it inside their own network?
Sorry, shouldn't have said "leaked".
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone?, (continued)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Stephen Fisher (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Chris Adams (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Matt Levine (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Stephen Fisher (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Matthew S. Hallacy (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Sean Donelan (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Tomas Lund (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? ken emery (Jan 22)
- Re: AT&T carrying rfc1918 on the as7018 backbone? Brett Watson (Jan 22)
