nanog mailing list archives
RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:57:09 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
not trying to defend the 7500 platform, it's obsolete all right. However, free is music to my ears.What about longer term maintenance issues? Is the 7500 not scheduled for EOL from Cisco 'soon' ? So, purchasing 7500 bits that might be dropped by 'normal' Cisco support in 1 year versus purchasing some other hardware that will be in support longer might pay out in the longer term?
They recently refreshed the platform with RSP16, VIP8, and MX. It's still a viable platform for many medium size providers. I personally wouldn't use it for anything passing more than a couple hundred megs (at absolute most), but we have plenty of nodes like that. Actually, we've been seeing a trend where we are replacing 4700's with 7505/7's. -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
Current thread:
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!, (continued)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Jeff Kell (Jan 06)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Rob Healey (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Alexei Roudnev (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Ejay Hire (Jan 08)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Charles Sprickman (Jan 08)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Wojtek Zlobicki (Jan 08)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Rob Healey (Jan 08)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 08)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Alex Rubenstein (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Hank Nussbacher (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Petri Helenius (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Alex Rubenstein (Jan 07)
- Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Neil J. McRae (Jan 08)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! Alex Rubenstein (Jan 07)
- RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my! jlewis (Jan 07)
