nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2511 line break
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:56:30 -0400
In message <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407270423300.1665 () volatile cableone at>, Ingo Flasch berger writes:
also telnet is sometimes the last chance over "full" lines (encryption likes packetloss)
This doesn't make much sense. ssh and telnet both run over TCP; TCP
handles any lost packets. If you're talking about IPsec, it was
engineered to make each packet cryptographically independent. The only
possible issue is that ssh packets are somewhat longer, thus rendering
them slightly more expensive to transmit and slightly more liable to
random bit errors. But the latter is very unlikely -- you were talking
about congestion -- and the effect of the former is minimal compared to
the speed of any likely line.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- RE: 2511 line break, (continued)
- RE: 2511 line break Michel Py (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Dickson, Brian (Jul 26)
- RE: 2511 line break Michel Py (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Robert Bonomi (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Ingo Flaschberger (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Joe Abley (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Randy Bush (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Joe Abley (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Randy Bush (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Ingo Flaschberger (Jul 26)
- Re: 2511 line break Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Petri Helenius (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Petri Helenius (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Randy Bush (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Niels Bakker (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Richard Welty (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break Jeff Shultz (Jul 27)
- Re: 2511 line break jdisher (Jul 29)
