nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tracking the bad guys
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 11:18:03 +0000
Eric Brunner-Williams is slightly incorrect
that happens.
Whois records
if you read my note, the only whois data of interest is the registrar and the ns providers (and their ns providers). other data of interest originates from rir public rwhois servers.
Meanwhile ... the miscreant's IP address ...
this instance was interesting in its unsophistication. from a related
writing:
The insertion network is is single address [151.42.235.185].
The subscriber network is is single property [paxil-medication].
More generally, multiple robo-hosts comprise the insertion network
(attack side), trailing, but following the same technical trajectory
as SMTP spam, and multiple URL payloads (benefit side), and commit
only a few ad inserts in any discrete attack over a larger range of
targets.
I'd recommend that Eric check nic-naa.net's whois phone numbers,
that was the one useful item you wrote. core-50 may have a problem, and it may be the case that the core-srs whois server may have a problem. thanks for the data point. incidently, in addition to post-detection persistent blocking, temporal approaches (interstitical gap management) for a single attack address are available, and a nanog reader has mentioned an implementation of a baysean approache in private mail. eric
Current thread:
- Re: Tracking the bad guys Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking the bad guys Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 02)
