nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: "Jon R. Kibler" <Jon.Kibler () aset com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:12:35 -0400
Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
On Jun 18, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Wayne E. Bouchard wrote: <SNIP>Um, unless I really missed something during this whole episode, that was the only way TO disable it.Have the roots recurse and put a wildcard in for anything that does not resolve. Makes Paul a ... well, not a competitor, 'cause that would imply they were in competition. If the roots put in the wild card, the GTLDs cannot compete.
Geee, we block sitefinder's ip both inbound and outbound at our border router... I wonder what that makes us? A competitor? A conspirator? A saboteur? ??? Jon Kibler -- Jon R. Kibler Chief Technical Officer A.S.E.T., Inc. Charleston, SC USA (843) 849-8214 ================================================== Filtered by: TRUSTEM.COM's Email Filtering Service http://www.trustem.com/ No Spam. No Viruses. Just Good Clean Email.
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN, (continued)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 20)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jon R. Kibler (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Henry Linneweh (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN David Lesher (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
