Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-11-19, at 12.46, Jeroen Massar wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:15 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > On 18-nov-04, at 18:02, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> >
> > > Larger enterprises probably consist of 200 'sites' already, eg 
> > > seperate
> > > offices, locations etc. Thus they can, after becoming a LIR and 
> > > getting
> > > an ASN, which most of the time they already have, easily get a /32.
> >
> > Jeroen, this is nonsense and you know it.
>
> It is not nonsense as long as 'multi6' doesn't have a solution to the
> problem, but as politics go above getting solutions...

I am not sure I follow you here? Multi6 in D.C decided to spin of the 
protocol work in a new WG under the Internet Area. I think that for the 
last few years, multi6 has moved forward as fast as anyone could ask.

- - kurtis - / Co-chair multi6

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQZ9b8qarNKXTPFCVEQLV2wCg+XtQqEH/oo0QjoT4a3LHag8YHlwAoP2I
L/o/iD6ydT1aXpIz5xYR3MLO
=s/g5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----