nanog mailing list archives
Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ?
From: Jay Hennigan <jay () west net>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Joe Shen wrote:
Hi,
the network path is:
|-(ADSL)--------\
customer/ --Edge_router---...---Japan
Server
\-(100Methernet)-/
So, from edge_router to Japan server the path is
identical.
Yes. But, for ftp TCP control real end-to-end
transmission speed.
I attached a monitor computer to our core router along
the path between customer's site and server.
Monitoring computer ping customer's site by targeting
both ends of ADSL line and ethernet line. The
measuring is scheduled 20packet per 20seconds, we also
ping each hop address along the path to server. The
result shows there is no packet loss along from
monitoring computer to customer site, but packet loss
increase at a special hop along the path to server in
japan.
So, we think the bottleneck is not inside our network.
And, TCP connection between customer's computer and
its server should be affacted by same bottleneck. So,
the uploading speed should be similar (?), but it
shows so much difference!
I can think of three possible things: 1. MTU over the ethernet and ADSL lines is different and there is fragmentation occuring when the ethernet link is used. Look at packet sizes with your sniffer and/or try sweeping a range of ping sizes. 2. Somewhere in the path there are parallel load-balanced paths with variable delay resulting in packets arriving out-of-order more frequently when sent over the ethernet link, due to the packets arriving more frequently in bursts when originating from the faster link. Do you have a group of load-sharing per-packet links in your core over which the traffic flows? Could also be beyond your control. Ethereal at the receiving end might show this. 3. As was previously suggested, aggresive rate-limiting or policing happening along the long-haul. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay () west net WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323 WB6RDV NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/
Current thread:
- RE: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ?, (continued)
- RE: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Mike McSpedon (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Gordon (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Marc Binderberger (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Andy Dills (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Alex Bligh (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Andy Dills (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Alex Bligh (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Alexei Roudnev (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? sergei (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Marc Binderberger (Oct 15)
- Re: why upload with adsl is faster than 100M ethernet ? Jay Hennigan (Oct 15)
