nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verisign vs. ICANN


From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:20:40 -0700 (PDT)


On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
In short, if you want to make money selling your patent to someone then you
must have a valid business that loses money so that your lawsuit against
them will have teeth.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:46:07AM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
So the attorney creates an IP holding company to which the patent is 
assigned, and the company offers to license the patent to Verisign. 
When Verisign refuses, they get sued for lost revenue.
The holding company must be making money from the patent to demonstrate the 
value of the loss.  It can't be a silent owner -- these have been fairly
routinely tossed out of court as meritless.

Do you have an example of such a case?

-Dan


Current thread: