nanog mailing list archives
Re: European Nanog?
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:49:26 +0200
On 13.09.2004 11:37 Neil J. McRae wrote:
2. EOF is not a RIPE NCC activity.Who runs/funds/maintains it then?
EOF is run my itself and has a status as a RIPE WG, hence imbedded in RIPE. Arnold
Current thread:
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog?, (continued)
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog? Bill Woodcock (Sep 13)
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog? Philip Smith (Sep 13)
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog? Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Sep 14)
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog? Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog? Richard Welty (Sep 14)
- Re: Any Kine NOGs? Re: European Nanog? Kuniaki Kondo (Sep 14)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Roland Perry (Sep 14)
- Re: European Nanog? Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 15)