nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIP in Operation
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden () geek net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:41:36 -0500 (CDT)
Oh certainly, RIPv2. I tend to just assume that "RIP" is generic and everyone means v2. - Robert On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 sthaug () nethelp no wrote:
We use RIP extensively on the edges of our network to build a Layer3 routed overlay between 3550/3750 switches and our 6500-based core. At $2k/list for the EMI license PER SWITCH ($4k for 3750s), it just wasn't feasible for us to use EMI just for OSPF when all we were really announcing was a loopback and a /30 connected network. We route filter and tune the RIP times down quite a bit. Meets our needs on the edges.I assume you mean RIPv2, ie. classless. With that caveat, I can certainly see why RIP would be used. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- RIP in Operation Abhishek Verma (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation bmanning (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Tulip Rasputin (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Patrick W Gilmore (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Robert A. Hayden (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation sthaug (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Robert A. Hayden (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Tony Li (Sep 16)
