nanog mailing list archives

Re: RIP in Operation


From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden () geek net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:41:36 -0500 (CDT)


Oh certainly, RIPv2.  I tend to just assume that "RIP" is generic and 
everyone means v2.  

- Robert

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 sthaug () nethelp no wrote:

We use RIP extensively on the edges of our network to build a Layer3 
routed overlay between 3550/3750 switches and our 6500-based core.  At 
$2k/list for the EMI license PER SWITCH ($4k for 3750s), it just wasn't 
feasible for us to use EMI just for OSPF when all we were really 
announcing was a loopback and a /30 connected network.

We route filter and tune the RIP times down quite a bit.  Meets our needs 
on the edges.

I assume you mean RIPv2, ie. classless. With that caveat, I can certainly
see why RIP would be used.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no



Current thread: