nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer?
From: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg () ripe net>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:28:24 +0200
On 01.09 15:18, Matt Larson wrote:
I can give you one data point: VeriSign anycasts j.root-servers.net from all the same locations (minus one) where the com/net authoritative servers (i.e., *.gtld-servers.net) are located. An informal examination of query rates among all the J root instances (traffic distribution via BGP) vs. query rates among all the com/net servers (traffic distribution via iterative resolver algorithms, which means round trip time in the case of BIND and Microsoft) shows much more even distribution when the iterative resolvers get to pick vs. BGP. .... For what it's worth,
Thanks Matt for sharing this observation. Based on my own informal observations this has to be taken with a truck load of NaCl. The load characteristics of TLD servers and root servers are vastly different. The root servers usually get large amounts of (bogus) load from relatively few sources whereas the sources of load for TLD servers are more evenly distributed to start with. Daniel
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer?, (continued)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Paul Vixie (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Steve Francis (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Patrick W Gilmore (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Bill Woodcock (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Steve Francis (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Duane Wessels (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Paul Jakma (Sep 01)
- Re: DNS Anycast as traffic optimizer? Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 02)
