nanog mailing list archives
Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
But that will also depend on how APNIC responds to problems. If Network X has a customer who is a problem, and we can't find out customer's name / e-mail / whatever, then Network X better be responsive. If not, then APNIC better be responsive.
I guess the thinking is that apnic address space is so widely nullrouted already, so things cant get any worse. -Dan
Current thread:
- APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update George Michaelson (Sep 22)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Matt Ghali (Sep 23)
- Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Patrick W Gilmore (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Dan Hollis (Sep 23)
- Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Gary E. Miller (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update william(at)elan.net (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Henry Linneweh (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Joe Abley (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Leo Bicknell (Sep 23)
- RE: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Matthew Kaufman (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Andrew - Supernews (Sep 23)
- Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update Matt Ghali (Sep 23)
