nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?


From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:00:10 -0800


On 02/25/05, just me <matt () snark net> wrote: 

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Edward B. Dreger wrote:

  Internal users:  With AUTH - correlate message with authenticated user,
  then forbid mail transmission for them only.  I'd rather do that than
  slog through RADIUS logs.  But, hey, maybe if I had more free time...

Increasing the detail of an audit trail doesnt mean anyone will 
automatically use the information in an effective manner.

Without auth, most ISPs could correlate abuse behavior between MTA 
logs and RADIUS logs, if they cared. Most don't. SMTP AUTH won't 
change that.  

        I don't get it, Matt.  Are you trying to tell us that because 
        some ISP's don't care, the ISP's who /do/ care /shouldn't/ move 
        their users to doing mail submissions on port 587?

-- 
J.D. Falk                                          uncertainty is only a virtue
<jdfalk () cybernothing org>                    when you don't know the answer yet


Current thread: