nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:00:10 -0800
On 02/25/05, just me <matt () snark net> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Edward B. Dreger wrote: Internal users: With AUTH - correlate message with authenticated user, then forbid mail transmission for them only. I'd rather do that than slog through RADIUS logs. But, hey, maybe if I had more free time... Increasing the detail of an audit trail doesnt mean anyone will automatically use the information in an effective manner. Without auth, most ISPs could correlate abuse behavior between MTA logs and RADIUS logs, if they cared. Most don't. SMTP AUTH won't change that.
I don't get it, Matt. Are you trying to tell us that because
some ISP's don't care, the ISP's who /do/ care /shouldn't/ move
their users to doing mail submissions on port 587?
--
J.D. Falk uncertainty is only a virtue
<jdfalk () cybernothing org> when you don't know the answer yet
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?), (continued)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Niels Bakker (Feb 25)
- Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) Steven J. Sobol (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Eric A. Hall (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Frank Louwers (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? just me (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Christopher X. Candreva (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? just me (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Christopher X. Candreva (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Edward B. Dreger (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? just me (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? J.D. Falk (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? just me (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Sean Donelan (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Edward B. Dreger (Feb 26)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Adrian Chadd (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Jim Popovitch (Feb 24)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Adrian Chadd (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Eric A. Hall (Feb 25)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Frank Louwers (Feb 25)
