nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com
From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:18:03 +0000
And not to forget that Panix was the 1st victim ever of a SYN attack in Sept 1996: http://www.panix.com/press/synattack.html http://www.panix.com/press/synattack2.html
And due to coordinated action between members of the NANOG mailing list and the FIREWALLS mailing list, within 24 hours, there were patches made available for Linux and various BSD kernels that mitigated these attacks. This type of an event shows the real power of the NANOG mailing list to communicate in a crisis. If only we could extend this communication to other media (INOC-DBA) and to include representatives of more network operators. I hope that the NANOG reform discussion spends a good bit of its time on articulating a vision for the future of a membership-based NANOG organization, and not worry so much about past problems. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Bruce Tonkin (Jan 20)
- Date of transfer request (was: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com) Richard Parker (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Hank Nussbacher (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Michael . Dillon (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Hank Nussbacher (Jan 20)
- Re: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Regarding registrar LOCK for panix.com Bruce Tonkin (Jan 20)
- improving the registrar transfer process William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- Re: improving the registrar transfer process Thornton (Jan 20)
- improving the registrar transfer process William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
