nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 19:39:55 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
No to nit picks, but do zip codes share the same boundaries as municipalities?
How about an anycast address implement(ed|able) by every network provider that would return a zipcode? $ telnet 10.255.255.254 Connected 33709 Disconnected. $ Cheers, -- jra
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
Current thread:
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP, (continued)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Peter & Karin Dambier (May 01)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Michael . Dillon (May 03)
- Providing location information to IP end-nodes Jay R. Ashworth (May 03)
- Re: Providing location information to IP end-nodes Michael . Dillon (May 04)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Robert Boyle (May 01)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (May 01)
- Message not available
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Jay R. Ashworth (May 01)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP David Lesher (May 01)
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Steven J. Sobol (May 01)
- RE: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Christopher L. Morrow (May 01)
- Message not available
- Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Jay R. Ashworth (May 02)
