nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 07:57:33 +0200
* Chris Woodfield:
Said the flowerpot: "Oh no, not again..." http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8DEL2TO7.htm? campaign_id=apn_tech_down&chan=tc
I don't understand what VeriSign receives in return for their kowtow
(under the agreement, they basically waive any right to criticize
ICANN's role).
Two possible explanations:
* ICANN signalled a positive outcome of a future Sitefinder review
under the new process.
* ICANN promised to grant VeriSign the DNSSEC root and .ARPA
maintenance without tender (the "Root Server Management Transition
Agreement" goes into that direction; actually, the .ARPA stuff is
the interesting one).
* VeriSign has recognized that they couldn't win in court, and
suddenly want to play nice.
Current thread:
- ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Chris Woodfield (Oct 24)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Florian Weimer (Oct 24)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder william(at)elan.net (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Florian Weimer (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Todd Vierling (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder william(at)elan.net (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder John Levine (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Oct 27)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Florian Weimer (Oct 24)
