nanog mailing list archives
Fw: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:54:34 +0100
While I realize that the "nuke survivable" thing is probably an old wives tale, it seems ridiculous that "the Internet" can't adjust by routing any packets that used to go directly from Cogent to Level 3 though some 3rd (and) 4th (and) 5th set of providers that are connected in some fashion to both...
It's not a myth. If the Internet were running RIP instead of BGP that is likely what would happen. Of course, there are a few downsides to running RIP on the open Internet as well... Today's Internet is a few generations beyond what Paul Baran originally conceived and the policy and politics of business does tend to gum up the works a bit now that there is no serious threat of global nuclear war. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Fw: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Michael . Dillon (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Kristoff (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven Champeon (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Joel Jaeggli (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven Champeon (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Levine (Oct 07)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Kristoff (Oct 06)
