nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent move without renumbering
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:43:38 -0400
Is it reasonable to think that numerous /24's from L3's IP space could be reassigned elsewhere without causing significant trouble for L3 and others? Even if it could work, what would be the justification for taking L3's property?
Depending upon the circumstance, yes: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg01880.html
Current thread:
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering william(at)elan.net (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Charles Cala (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Elmar K. Bins (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Charles Cala (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Oct 07)
- RE: Cogent move without renumbering william(at)elan.net (Oct 07)
