nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:47:27 -1000
but, if you read my message, the point is that all the major hosted services will not be dual stack. half of them can't even provide well-deployed ipv4 service; try united.com.Maybe ISPs should start warning them of what's coming....
and what do we suggest that they do, or tell them what we are doing to help? roll back the clock 12 years and inject ops clue into the ivtf v6 ivory tower? get a bigger clue by four to hammer clue into the v6 marketeers? randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Bjørn Mork (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Geoff Huston (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Oct 13)
