nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:52:50 +0100
There are a few interesting questions here (partially rhetorical):
And also: Should your company be preparing to operate v6 services at all? Popular opinion is that when the automobile was invented, all buggy manufacturers shut down. This is not true. http://www.liveryone.net/ IPv6 is one of those things that will be a market differentiator. Some people will have no need to transition and there will be a market for providing v4 services to these people. I expect that the market for v4-v6 gateway services will last for a long time. The smaller companies on this list are not faced with the same kind of technology imperatives as the larger ones. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news), (continued)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Nicholas Suan (Oct 14)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Bernhard Schmidt (Oct 15)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Marshall Eubanks (Oct 15)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border Simon Leinen (Oct 16)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border Todd Vierling (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: 6to4 gateways Perry Lorier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Oct 13)
- RE: IPv6 news K. Scott Bethke (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 13)
