nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 news


From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:56:07 -0700 (PDT)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yo Michael!

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:

Here, the suggestion is that netblocks should
be allocated to cities, not to providers. Within
a city, providers would get a subset of the city
address block to meet their local infrastructure
needs. They would interconnect with each other
a local exchange points to exchange local traffic

And who is going to force the ISPs to interconnect at the city level?
For competitive reasons there is no peering in my city.  The nearest
peering points are several hundred miles away, in different directions,
and even those are not shared in common by the local ISPs.

RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
        gem () rellim com  Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDU9eq8KZibdeR3qURAnBfAKC4ZBCUrGq9HgW80FJxIGqfbR7mowCgi4GD
ykujmYnq/FPv6MA1nKdf49A=
=aUG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: