nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi homing pressure
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:56:32 -0700
Well, not necessarily. Tier-2s should be given much more credit than they typically are in write-ups like this. When a customer is single homed to a tier-2 that has multiple tier-1 upstreams, and uses a delegated netblock from the tier-2's aggregations, that means one less ASN and one or more less routes in the global table. It's a Good Thing(tm).
Not for the single-homed customer when the Tier-2 service is interrupted. Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: multi homing pressure, (continued)
- Re: multi homing pressure Owen DeLong (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure Elmar K. Bins (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure Owen DeLong (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure Elmar K. Bins (Oct 21)
- Re: multi homing pressure Erik Haagsman (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure John Dupuy (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Daniel Senie (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Alexei Roudnev (Oct 23)
- Re: multi homing pressure James (Oct 24)
- Re: multi homing pressure Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Owen DeLong (Oct 19)
