nanog mailing list archives
Re: AW: Odd policy question.
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:51:24 +0100
* Jeffrey I. Schiller:
Let me attempt to bring this back to the policy question. Does someone have the *right* to put one of your IP addresses as an NS record for their domain even if you do not agree?
I don't think it's allowed (and it shouldn't be), but without a cluestick from legal, you won't find anyone who will force the offender to fix it. If this were okay, certainly you wouldn't have objected to someone pointing the A RR of kimble.org to your company web servers, back when Blaster.E was at its height, would you? 8-)
Current thread:
- Re: AW: Odd policy question., (continued)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 17)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Joseph S D Yao (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Martin Hannigan (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Martin Hannigan (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Florian Weimer (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. William Yardley (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 13)
