nanog mailing list archives
Re: AW: Odd policy question.
From: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis () MIT EDU>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:44:02 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joe Abley wrote:
That's a little over-broad considering the number of registries there are (and have been, for a long time). I think it's fair to say that even if this was once the case for COM/NET/ORG registries, there are many more registries where this was never close to being true. It seems to me that if someone else chooses to insert 32- or 128-bit integers of their choice into their zone files, then there's properly very little I can or should be able to do about it. But that's just me.
You are indeed correct. There is also no good efficient way to know if
someone is allowed to use a particular IP address, or will have the
right for the life of an extended contract (like a 10 year DNS
registration).
As an engineer, I believe we would need a protocol that would permit
someone to query an IP address to ask what DNS domains it may be an NS
for. A simple client server response protocol. Lack of a response would
mean "all are welcome here." Sort of the analogue of "robots.txt" for
webservers. Then if you wanted to disclaim a domain, you setup a server
and notify the registrar of the offending domain.
Now as a practical matter, I don't see this happening any time soon.
This is simply because this is a lot of mechanism for a problem that I
doubt many people have.
-Jeff
- --
=============================================================================
Jeffrey I. Schiller
MIT Network Manager
Information Services and Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Avenue Room W92-190
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
617.253.0161 - Voice
jis () mit edu
============================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDyXCg8CBzV/QUlSsRAon/AKD6k5Qd1p8jUqGxWEHKYbLec9GgtgCg6bTN
GMITL/Fk0qm9sWu4A/M4suA=
=88Yt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: AW: Odd policy question., (continued)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Joe Abley (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Sean Donelan (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Joe Abley (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. william(at)elan.net (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Martin Hannigan (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. David W. Hankins (Jan 17)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Joseph S D Yao (Jan 14)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Martin Hannigan (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 13)
- Re: AW: Odd policy question. Martin Hannigan (Jan 13)
