nanog mailing list archives

Re: ONS - The few the proud ... the sleeping


From: Stephen Wilcox <steve.wilcox () packetrade com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:51:47 +0100


On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:00:36PM +0100, michael.dillon () bt com wrote:

Unless all these bots are directly connected (direct 
customer) and concentrated on one portion of the network (not 
spread across the entire access layer) I can't imagine with 
the tools, features, products, etc that are available today 
(that can almost manage dDoS attacks for you) that it 
couldn't be mitigated.  5-6 years ago this would have been a 
lot tougher, but it was still doable.

Remote triggered BGP blackhole filtering comes to mind
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/cons/isp/security/Remote-Triggered-Black-Hole-Fi
ltering-02.pdf

And if the bots are directly connected or concentrated in one point of
the network, it seems to me that simple ACLs can mitigate the attack.

I agree that DDoS is not likely to take down a network big enough to be
called a backbone unless there is some kind of unforeseen side effects
to the DDoS.

unless they are not 'in' the network and hence cant be stopped internally and have the potential to overwhelm any 
external interface.. these cannot be mitigated without cooperation from other networks

Steve


Current thread: