nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:14:14 -0700
--- neal () lists rauhauser net wrote:
: I don't know much about Juniper but I'm about to learn
: with a new job.
If your experience is like mine, you'll fall in love with the M-series and absolutely despise the E-series (Unisphere)
: If I'm going to take full routes from a couple of upstreams
: and have a couple of peers will the M10i (768M max) be
: enough or is the M20 (2048M max) a better choice.
I use the M10i platform for some of my border routers. For example, below, I'm receiving full routes from a couple of
upstreams and a partial with 768Meg for a good while now and no problems.
RE0> show chassis routing-engine
<snip>
Routing Engine status:
DRAM 768 MB
Memory utilization 46 percent
Model RE-5.0
RE0> show bgp summary
<snip>
ASN #Active/Received/Damped
------ ----------------------------
AAA 625/994/0
BBB 152613/214987/0
CCC 62655/215400/0
scott
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?, (continued)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? sthaug (May 14)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Chris L. Morrow (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 13)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Hyunseog Ryu (May 14)
- oversubscribed ports for Juniper are a new feature Neal Rauhauser (May 14)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Chris L. Morrow (May 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Donald Stahl (May 14)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Warren Kumari (May 15)
- Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20? Daniel Roesen (May 17)
