nanog mailing list archives
Re: How Not to Multihome
From: Keegan.Holley () sungard com
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:25:29 -0400
I'm really interested to see what happens when we start filling those same routers with ipv6 routes. Randy Bush <randy () psg com> Sent by: owner-nanog () merit edu 10/08/2007 06:10 PM To "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org> cc nanog <nanog () merit edu> Subject Re: How Not to Multihome
It's not 'law' per se, but having the customer originate their own announcements is definitely the Right Way to go.
it is interesting, and worrysome, to consider this in light of likely growth in the routing table (ref ipv4 free pool run out discussion) and vendors' inability to handle large ribs and fibs on enterprise class routers. randy
Current thread:
- How Not to Multihome Keegan . Holley (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Wayne E. Bouchard (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Keegan . Holley (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Justin M. Streiner (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Randy Bush (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Keegan . Holley (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Joel Jaeggli (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Keegan . Holley (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Joel Jaeggli (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Justin M. Streiner (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Randy Bush (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 routes, was: How Not to Multihome Mike Leber (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 routes, was: How Not to Multihome Keegan . Holley (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 routes, was: How Not to Multihome William Herrin (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Justin M. Streiner (Oct 08)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
