nanog mailing list archives
Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome)
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:06:52 -0700
Hi, On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
However, if it's less than a /24 it won't get very far as most upstreams block prefixes longer than a /24.
I'm curious: a couple of people have indicated they do not believe this to be the case. Anybody have any hard data on what filters are actually in use today?
Others have indicated that such filters (assuming they exist) will not last in the face of paying customers presenting longer than /24 prefixes for routing. Specifically, that ISPs will relax their filters (allowing longer than /24) in order to get their peers to accept their long prefixes. Anybody have an opinion on the likelihood of this?
Thanks, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: How Not to Multihome, (continued)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Justin M. Streiner (Oct 09)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Stephen Satchell (Oct 10)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 09)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 09)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 09)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Leo Vegoda (Oct 09)
- Re: How Not to Multihome Andy Davidson (Oct 09)
- Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) David Conrad (Oct 08)
- Re: Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 08)
- Re: Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) Justin M. Streiner (Oct 08)
- Re: Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) Jon Lewis (Oct 08)
- Re: Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) Justin M. Streiner (Oct 08)
- Re: Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) David Conrad (Oct 08)
- Re: Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Upstreams blocking /24s? (was Re: How Not to Multihome) Keegan . Holley (Oct 09)
- Easy and hard multihoming (was: Re: Upstreams blocking /24s) David Barak (Oct 10)
