Re: 240/4

[Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>]

* Pekka Savola:

> Do we need to classify anything (yet)?
>
> I say the proof is in the pudding.  Once some major user decides
> they'll need 240/4 for something, they'll end up knocking their
> vendors' (probably dozens) and their own ops folks' doors.

If there's risk that we'll see end user assignments from 240/4 at any
time in the future, this certainly reduces the set of possible
experiments even further.  So I think it makes sense to designate part
of it as "private use, not subject to allocation" if anybody sees any
benefit from encouraging experimentation.